Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RDF Translation] should obo:RO_0000051 be obo:BFO_0000051? #231

Open
rkboyce opened this issue Dec 9, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

[RDF Translation] should obo:RO_0000051 be obo:BFO_0000051? #231

rkboyce opened this issue Dec 9, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@rkboyce
Copy link
Collaborator

rkboyce commented Dec 9, 2017

I noticed that the RO entity referred to below does not seem to be present in the current release of RO - should it actually the BFO entity below?

## bearer of: precipitant drug role
map:precipitant_bearer_role_of a d2rq:PropertyBridge;
    d2rq:belongsToClassMap map:BearerPrecipitantRole;
    d2rq:property obo:RO_0000051;
    d2rq:uriSqlExpression "CONCAT('http://dikb.org/precipitant-drug-role/', ohdsi.rdf_mp_claim_qualifier.p_drug_role_urn)";
    .

## has_part scattered molecular aggregate
map:precipitant_bearer_of a d2rq:PropertyBridge;
        d2rq:belongsToClassMap map:BearerPrecipitantRole;
        d2rq:property obo:BFO_0000051;
    d2rq:uriSqlExpression "CONCAT('http://dikb.org/p-scattered-molecular-aggregate/', ohdsi.rdf_mp_claim_qualifier.p_scattered_molecular_aggregate_urn)";
    .
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants