You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Definitely just an enhancement, and just an idea, but would be helpful to group the conditions together above the actions: from a usability perspective, it's a little easier to understand what's going on - i.e. if (all the conditions)...then(actions) - than when they are all mixed up. It took me a minute to figure out what the table meant.
Maybe also clarify the action, as in "action: change value to" and swap the Value and Component columns. Then it's more clear that the action is to change the indicated property to the new value.
Like this:
to this:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks, Jess. This is a good suggestion. We had a discussion with Christoph, the interface to create rules is a bit too simple and doesn't allow to capture nuances about conflicts. I am working on a new version. I will keep in mind your recommendations.
Definitely just an enhancement, and just an idea, but would be helpful to group the conditions together above the actions: from a usability perspective, it's a little easier to understand what's going on - i.e. if (all the conditions)...then(actions) - than when they are all mixed up. It took me a minute to figure out what the table meant.
Maybe also clarify the action, as in "action: change value to" and swap the Value and Component columns. Then it's more clear that the action is to change the indicated property to the new value.
Like this:
to this:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: