You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
next_cell grid x
:Array<String>->Int->Boollet len =length grid inlet a = nth grid (idx_of (x -1) len) inlet b = nth grid x inlet c = nth grid (idx_of (x +1) len) in
is_alive a b c
Example 2
next_cell grid x
:Array<String>->Int->Bool= (λlen ->
(λa ->
(λb ->
(λc -> is_alive a b c)
(nth grid (idx_of (x -1) len)))
(nth grid x))
(nth grid (idx_of (x +1) len)))
(length grid)
In the first version using let expressions, the code is structured to make it more readable and easier to understand. It follows a sequence of steps to achieve the desired result:
let len = length grid calculates the length of the grid and assigns it to the variable len.
let a = nth grid (idx_of (x - 1) len) retrieves the element at the position x - 1 within the grid and assigns it to the variable a.
let b = nth grid x retrieves the element at the position x within the grid and assigns it to the variable b.
let c = nth grid (idx_of (x + 1) len) retrieves the element at the position x + 1 within the grid and assigns it to the variable c.
Finally, the result of is_alive a b c is returned, indicating whether the cell at position x is alive or not.
The second version uses lambda expressions to achieve the same result. It explicitly defines nested anonymous functions, passing arguments between them:
(λlen -> ...) defines a lambda function that takes the len argument.
(λa -> ...) defines a lambda function that takes the a argument.
(λb -> ...) defines a lambda function that takes the b argument.
(λc -> is_alive a b c) defines a lambda function that takes the c argument and uses the a, b, and c values to call the is_alive function.
In both cases, the code structures the logic of checking cell status based on its neighbors, but the first version with let expressions provides a more natural, sequential representation of the same computation, making it easier to read and understand.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Example 1
Example 2
In the first version using
let
expressions, the code is structured to make it more readable and easier to understand. It follows a sequence of steps to achieve the desired result:let len = length grid
calculates the length of thegrid
and assigns it to the variablelen
.let a = nth grid (idx_of (x - 1) len)
retrieves the element at the positionx - 1
within thegrid
and assigns it to the variablea
.let b = nth grid x
retrieves the element at the positionx
within thegrid
and assigns it to the variableb
.let c = nth grid (idx_of (x + 1) len)
retrieves the element at the positionx + 1
within thegrid
and assigns it to the variablec
.is_alive a b c
is returned, indicating whether the cell at positionx
is alive or not.The second version uses lambda expressions to achieve the same result. It explicitly defines nested anonymous functions, passing arguments between them:
(λlen -> ...)
defines a lambda function that takes thelen
argument.(λa -> ...)
defines a lambda function that takes thea
argument.(λb -> ...)
defines a lambda function that takes theb
argument.(λc -> is_alive a b c)
defines a lambda function that takes thec
argument and uses thea
,b
, andc
values to call theis_alive
function.In both cases, the code structures the logic of checking cell status based on its neighbors, but the first version with
let
expressions provides a more natural, sequential representation of the same computation, making it easier to read and understand.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: