-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Status of Go version? #18
Comments
The go version works fine. Since the actual scope for the library is very small the go codebase very rarely needs to change. A condax that is written in go and basically vendors in micromamba/ generates it locally using ensureconda would be pretty neat. |
Thanks for the info! Regarding the Python-free I'd love to get your input if you get the chance. In particular I'm wondering about Go vs Bash as a language choice... I hate Bash but I haven't written anything yet with Go. 😆 Also I have no idea how complicated it is these days to install Bash on Windows, and it'd be a shame to commit to Bash and to exclude everyone stuck on win. So perhaps the Go version of ensureconda could be a starting point? |
I would recommend doing that in Go, the deployment story is so much cleaner. |
I notice in the
src/golang/cmd
directory that there seems to be a version ofensureconda
written in Go, but unchanged over the last two years. It's not mentioned inREADME.md
, and I'm curious what is the status.Random thought: I'm intrigued by the possibility of a version of
condax
with no Python dependency, in the spirit ofmicromamba
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: