You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now, the Server schema we maintain with MongoDB is reliable...enough. We have yet to use types (#4) and that definitely extends to the database schema. (This is not good practice....) The focus of this issue is threefold:
Finish our early model of what the server schema looks like: what does the config object look like? How will we handle migrations?
Should we consider a different database paradigm and service provider? Relational → Postgres → Supabase?
Implement types for our schema, such as via Prisma.
Why
As discussed in #4, types are a safe long-term strategy for interacting with APIs, and that includes our own. Additionally, we'll almost certainly have to change the structure down the line, especially when making a new feature set. We ought to have a plan in place for that.
How
Consider alternative database paradigms and service providers
This'll be updated from there....
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What
Right now, the
Server
schema we maintain with MongoDB is reliable...enough. We have yet to use types (#4) and that definitely extends to the database schema. (This is not good practice....) The focus of this issue is threefold:config
object look like? How will we handle migrations?Why
As discussed in #4, types are a safe long-term strategy for interacting with APIs, and that includes our own. Additionally, we'll almost certainly have to change the structure down the line, especially when making a new feature set. We ought to have a plan in place for that.
How
This'll be updated from there....
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: