Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Package components followup #6335

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 15, 2023

Conversation

theobat
Copy link
Contributor

@theobat theobat commented Nov 14, 2023

This is simply the further consequences of the design merged in #6334.

In particular, it removes the ugly wart that was PackageDescriptionPair and realise most of the plan/changes that I described and proposed in #5920 (comment)

@theobat theobat force-pushed the package-component-deps branch from e4ac7f0 to 595bb9e Compare November 14, 2023 23:24
@theobat theobat changed the title Pcakge components followup Package components followup Nov 14, 2023
@theobat theobat force-pushed the package-component-deps branch from 595bb9e to c51f5e5 Compare November 14, 2023 23:29
@theobat theobat force-pushed the package-component-deps branch from c51f5e5 to e5b6344 Compare November 15, 2023 08:41
@theobat theobat force-pushed the package-component-deps branch from 0c93019 to f138991 Compare November 15, 2023 09:36
@mpilgrem mpilgrem merged commit 18308b1 into commercialhaskell:master Nov 15, 2023
13 checks passed
@mpilgrem
Copy link
Member

@theobat, thanks. It looked good to me, and I also tested it by using Stack to build Stack. I did a little reformatting and I preferred shorter processPackageDeps to processPackageDependencies and processPackageDepsToList to processPackageDependenciesToList.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants