Make taskAnyMissing a function, not field
#6321
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Also reorders test as `(taskAnyMissingHackEnabled && taskAnyMissing task)` Also passes `TaskType` rather than `Task`, to avoid use of `TaskType` values with dummy fields. Also improves related Haddock documentation and code comments.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The motivation for this is similar to the approach to
taskProvides: thetaskAnyMissingfield is determined by the value of other fields.Also reorders test as
(taskAnyMissingHackEnabled && taskAnyMissing task).Also passes
TaskTyperather thanTask, to avoid use ofTaskTypevalues with dummy fields.Also improves related Haddock documentation and code comments.
Please also shortly describe how you tested your change. Bonus points for added tests! Relying on CI.