You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There exist pairs of segments that represent the exact same sounds but differ in the placement of diacritics: [j̊]/[j̥], [ŋ̊]/[ŋ̥], [d̥ʒ̊]/[d̥ʒ̥], etc. Shouldn't these be merged?
I also see transcriptions with stacked diacritics like [l̪̥], but if you allow superscript versions of canonically subscript diacritics at all, why not transcribe them like [l̪̊]?
And why is the devoiced diacritic the only one you use two different versions of? For example, it seems to me [ɹ̪̩] is better transcribed [ɹ̪̍] (again, if you allow superscript versions at all).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
this will need to be fixed in the dev repository in order to fix it here. @xrotwang feel free to close in favor of phoible/dev#225 (unless you prefer to leave it open until this change actually makes it into clld/phoible)
There exist pairs of segments that represent the exact same sounds but differ in the placement of diacritics: [j̊]/[j̥], [ŋ̊]/[ŋ̥], [d̥ʒ̊]/[d̥ʒ̥], etc. Shouldn't these be merged?
I also see transcriptions with stacked diacritics like [l̪̥], but if you allow superscript versions of canonically subscript diacritics at all, why not transcribe them like [l̪̊]?
And why is the devoiced diacritic the only one you use two different versions of? For example, it seems to me [ɹ̪̩] is better transcribed [ɹ̪̍] (again, if you allow superscript versions at all).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: