You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
School districts are technically eligible for .gov, but it's an awkward fit. We should draft an FAQ about this, post it online, and share it with relevant parties.
Consider what text should be updated to point to this FAQ
Additional context
There are states (Utah, California) with laws requiring .gov's use, and it's being interpreted to include schools. There are also misunderstandings about the SLCGP, .gov, and school districts that this could help address.
Links to other issues
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@h-m-f-t - this still seems valuable. Thoughts on trying to address this? I see it also impacting Analyst workflow and communications if there's stronger public guidance.
Issue description
School districts are technically eligible for .gov, but it's an awkward fit. We should draft an FAQ about this, post it online, and share it with relevant parties.
Acceptance criteria
Additional context
There are states (Utah, California) with laws requiring .gov's use, and it's being interpreted to include schools. There are also misunderstandings about the SLCGP, .gov, and school districts that this could help address.
Links to other issues
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: