Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PBR textures support (Normal maps, height maps, emitter maps, specular maps) #751

Open
carterlasalle opened this issue Dec 17, 2020 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #1276
Open

PBR textures support (Normal maps, height maps, emitter maps, specular maps) #751

carterlasalle opened this issue Dec 17, 2020 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #1276

Comments

@carterlasalle
Copy link

Allows support for PBR texture packs, so 3d textures get rendered

@leMaik
Copy link
Member

leMaik commented Dec 17, 2020

This is a big feature and actually PBR includes multiple features:

  • Normal maps (implementation started)
  • Height/Parallax Occlusion maps
  • Specular maps
    • Emitter maps
    • Roughness maps
    • Reflectance maps
    • Metalness maps
      • Predefined f0 values for complex Fresnel equation (LabPBR 1.3)

Branch with normal maps: https://github.com/leMaik/chunky/tree/json-block-models-and-normal-maps (it's pretty slow. I hope that it'll be ready to be merged some day though)

Branch with specular maps (emittance, roughness, reflectance): https://github.com/leMaik/chunky/tree/pbr

Height maps are a whole different topic, but @jackjt8 and me already looked a bit into how it can be done.

Same issue in my fork: leMaik#14

@leMaik leMaik changed the title PBR Texture PBR textures support (Normal maps, height maps, emitter maps, specular maps) Dec 17, 2020
@leMaik leMaik self-assigned this Jan 10, 2021
@leMaik leMaik added this to the 2.5.0 milestone Jul 7, 2021
@leMaik leMaik removed this from the 2.5.0 milestone Aug 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants