Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

decide what framework to port to #29

Closed
chadwhitacre opened this issue Jan 29, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

decide what framework to port to #29

chadwhitacre opened this issue Jan 29, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Owner

Aspen is shedding its request and response objects, to become a "parasitic web framework" (AspenWeb/pando.py#526). What do we want to do over here on Mongs? The plan over on the Aspen project is to officially support Flask-Aspen and django-aspen adapters. Perhaps Flask-Aspen would make sense for Mongs?

@jaraco Given your familiarity with CherryPy, another option would be for you to write and maintain a CherryPy-Aspen adapter, and port Mongs to that.

A third option would be to port to Flask, Django, or CherryPy without the Aspen plugin.

@chadwhitacre chadwhitacre changed the title decide what framework to depend on decide what framework to port to Jan 29, 2016
@jaraco
Copy link
Collaborator

jaraco commented Jan 29, 2016

My preference would be for Flask-Aspen (or CherryPy-Aspen, but I don't want to write it).

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Owner Author

Okay. We've got a Flask shim inline in Aspen on AspenWeb/pando.py#527. Once that PR lands we can start porting here. Eventually the plan is to factor out Flask-Aspen into its own library.

@jaraco
Copy link
Collaborator

jaraco commented Mar 16, 2019

The latest version runs on Pando, so that's good enough for me.

@jaraco jaraco closed this as completed Mar 16, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants