Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MiCall for data on NextSeq/iSeq? plus other questions #1200

Open
ammaraziz opened this issue Nov 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

MiCall for data on NextSeq/iSeq? plus other questions #1200

ammaraziz opened this issue Nov 24, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@ammaraziz
Copy link

Hi CFE-Lab,

We (VIDRL) are moving from sanger sequencing to HTS sequencing using a custom hybridisation probe panel which will be sequenced on either iSeq or NextSeq. I've looked at a few pipelines, with MiCall being the (IMO) the one which ticks all the boxes. I had a few questions if you had sometime to answer:

  1. Can MiCall be used on different illumina platforms?
  2. From reading the code, the pipeline isn't tied to your internal systems (eg on Kive) and it can be deployed on any system?
  3. I want to confirm MiCall is doing the resistance interpretation locally and not using the Sierra API to transmit data to stanford?

Thanks!

Ammar

@donkirkby
Copy link
Member

We've only used it on MiSeq data, but its only critical dependency is on the FASTQ file format. You should be able to work around differences in any other dependencies, like the Interop folder data. MiCall doesn't need to run under Kive, you can run it under docker, run it under Singularity, run it on BaseSpace, or install the dependencies and run it directly on your system.

We're happy to give guidance if you have any questions as you try to run it on your own data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants