-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 297
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: add namespace Go definition to specs #3021
Conversation
I was linking to specs and noticed that the Protobuf section was empty. We don't have a Protobuf definition for namespace but we do have a Go definition. Ref: https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-app/blob/34c98b96fee6e5aaf0ce9cb7b0ec03ee47f24774/pkg/namespace/namespace.go#L8-L11
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe update involves integrating a concrete Go struct definition for Changes
Related issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
I was linking to specs and noticed that the Protobuf section was empty. We don't have a Protobuf definition for namespace but we do have a Go definition.
Ref:
celestia-app/pkg/namespace/namespace.go
Lines 8 to 11 in 34c98b9