Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): replace old qgb contracts repo with blobstream repo #2709

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 19, 2023

Conversation

rach-id
Copy link
Member

@rach-id rach-id commented Oct 17, 2023

Overview

The dependencies part of #2639

Checklist

  • New and updated code has appropriate documentation
  • New and updated code has new and/or updated testing
  • Required CI checks are passing
  • Visual proof for any user facing features like CLI or documentation updates
  • Linked issues closed with keywords

@rach-id rach-id added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file x/blobstream item is directly relevant to the blob module labels Oct 17, 2023
@rach-id rach-id self-assigned this Oct 17, 2023
@celestia-bot celestia-bot requested a review from a team October 17, 2023 22:43
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2709 (c4de13b) into main (2bf9999) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2709   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   19.89%   19.89%           
=======================================
  Files         139      139           
  Lines       16695    16695           
=======================================
  Hits         3322     3322           
  Misses      13051    13051           
  Partials      322      322           
Files Coverage Δ
x/qgb/client/verify.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
x/qgb/types/abi_consts.go 69.23% <ø> (ø)
x/qgb/types/valset.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)

@rach-id rach-id enabled auto-merge (squash) October 17, 2023 22:51
@rach-id rach-id added the backport:v1.x PR will be backported automatically to the v1.x branch upon merging label Oct 18, 2023
rootulp
rootulp previously approved these changes Oct 18, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@rootulp rootulp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[question] is this safe to backport? It seems non-breaking but I noticed that we're not backporting the other rename PR: #2639

@rach-id
Copy link
Member Author

rach-id commented Oct 18, 2023

The rename PR will not be backported until we test it in an upgrade and be sure that it's not breaking.

This one is clearly not breaking and would allow the new release to depend on the new renamed Blobstream contracts instead of depending on older version of QGB. Also, we will make new releases of Blobstream, so it makes sense to keep the v1.x up to date with latest Blobstream contracts

@rach-id rach-id merged commit c517bd2 into celestiaorg:main Oct 19, 2023
26 checks passed
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2023
<!--
Please read and fill out this form before submitting your PR.

Please make sure you have reviewed our contributors guide before
submitting your
first PR.
-->

## Overview

The dependencies part of
#2639

## Checklist

<!--
Please complete the checklist to ensure that the PR is ready to be
reviewed.

IMPORTANT:
PRs should be left in Draft until the below checklist is completed.
-->

- [ ] New and updated code has appropriate documentation
- [ ] New and updated code has new and/or updated testing
- [ ] Required CI checks are passing
- [ ] Visual proof for any user facing features like CLI or
documentation updates
- [ ] Linked issues closed with keywords

(cherry picked from commit c517bd2)

# Conflicts:
#	go.mod
#	x/qgb/client/verify.go
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport:v1.x PR will be backported automatically to the v1.x branch upon merging dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file x/blobstream item is directly relevant to the blob module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants