Javascript friendly error messages

[gotama]

Here is my execution :

var schema = xsd.parseFile(xsdPath);
var validationErrors = schema.validate(manifestItem.output);
validationErrors.forEach(element => {
     console.log('element: ', Object.entries(element));
});

which outputs

element:  [ [ 'domain', 17 ],
  [ 'code', 1871 ],
  [ 'level', 2 ],
  [ 'column', 0 ],
  [ 'line', 65535 ] ]

However when I run the below code I then get my XSD documented error messages.

var schema = xsd.parseFile(xsdPath);
var validationErrors = schema.validate(manifestItem.output);
validationErrors.forEach(element => {
     console.log('element: ',element);
});

which outputs

element:  { Error: Element 'Reporting': This element is not expected. Expected is one of ( DirectReporting, IndirectReporting ).

    at Schema.validate (/obfuscated/node_modules/libxmljs2-xsd/index.js:68:33)
    at /obfuscated/dist/utils/xml.js:37:51
    at new Promise (<anonymous>)
    at Object.orchestrateXML (/obfuscated/dist/utils/xml.js:12:12)
    at Object.<anonymous> (/obfuscated/dist/utils/orchestrate.js:62:52)
    at step (/obfuscated/dist/utils/orchestrate.js:33:23)
    at Object.next (/obfuscated/dist/utils/orchestrate.js:14:53)
    at /obfuscated/dist/utils/orchestrate.js:8:71
    at new Promise (<anonymous>)
    at __awaiter (/obfuscated/dist/utils/orchestrate.js:4:12) domain: 17, code: 1871, level: 2, column: 0, line: 65535 }

Is there any workaround to capturing the error message from the validationErrors array?

I have been looking into your source and src/xml_errors.cc builds these error messages, So I was thinking of injecting quotes and commas so that I can work with those messages in javascript.

Let me know, willing to assist but will need some guidance on the C side of things.

UPDATE:

I am using my fork with this output :

element:  { domain: 17,
  code: 1871,
  message: 'Element \'Reporting\': This element is not expected. Expected is one of ( DirectReporting, IndirectReporting ).\n',
  level: 2,
  column: 0,
  line: 65535 }

[gotama]

@cdegalitt

[cdegalitt]

Hi gotama,
First of all, thanks for your interest and contribution.
Sorry for the late answer, I had some off-time.
The way you report errors seems indeed much more appropriate.
I'll be lloking at your PR today.