Raise PayloadTooLarge error instead of InputTooLarge error in InputBox

[ZzzzHui]

📚 Context

Going forward, inputs are blockchain-agnostic blobs containing metadata and the input payload itself. If the blob is larger than the limit set by Cartesi Virtual Machine, contract InputBox raises an InputTooLarge error, with the input blob size and the limit, defined in the interface IInputBox.
However, this error can be confusing to the users as they may not know about the construction of the input blob under the hood, and it takes some figuring out and guess work to know how to adjust their payload argument to avoid the error.
The direct way would be to prompt the PayloadTooLarge error with the payload size and limit.

✔️ Solution

Replace InputTooLarge error with PayloadTooLarge.
May add a constant INPUT_PAYLOAD_MAX_SIZE in the common/CanonicalMachine library.

[guidanoli]

How would you calculate INPUT_PAYLOAD_MAX_SIZE based on INPUT_MAX_SIZE at compile time?

[ZzzzHui]

After this PR being merged, we add block.chainid and address(app) to the current structure of the input blob. So the input blob structure becomes:

Field	# bytes
selector	4
block.chainid	32
address(app)	32
msg.sender	32
block.number	32
block.timestamp	32
index	32
offset	32
size	32
payload	DYNAMIC

Therefore, the payload size limit is

INPUT_PAYLOAD_MAX_SIZE = 
                        (INPUT_MAX_SIZE - (4 + 32 * 8))
                                                        / 32 * 32

This is based on the encoding of EvmAdvance, which might change in the future. So the better place for this constant is probably in the InputBox contract rather than CanonicalMachine library. Because if the EvmAdvance encoding changes, the InputBox contract changes anyway.

What do you think?

[guidanoli]

Your thought process is solid, but the code that calculates INPUT_PAYLOAD_MAX_SIZE does not take the EvmAdvance function into consideration, which means that if someone changes the signature of this function but not this equation, they will be out-of-sync.

[ZzzzHui]

If someone changes EvmAdvance, they will update the contract InputBox as well, which is where the constant will be in.
If the equation is not updated properly, unit tests would catch that immediately.

[guidanoli]

Ideally, the constant should be updated automatically when the EvmAdvance function is updated, but I believe that is not currently possible with the Solidity compiler.

[guidanoli]

Having said that, I would keep things the way they are now.