You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Reading through your paper and your code, I noticed that for the $L^2$ attack, you use a regularization term $\Vert\delta\Vert_2^2$. But all the time except one in your paper, you mention $\Vert\delta\Vert_p$ (no square): in section A or for $L^{\infty}$ attack. Furthermore, Szegedy et al. also used it without square.
Questions:
Is this done purposefully?
Is it discussed anywhere?
Are you sure about the impact (or absence thereof) of the exponent on the results?
Thanks and congrats for achieving your goal:
We hope our attacks will be used as a benchmark in future defense attempts to create neural networks that resist adversarial examples.
Élie
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello @carlini,
Reading through your paper and your code, I noticed that for the$L^2$ attack, you use a regularization term $\Vert\delta\Vert_2^2$ . But all the time except one in your paper, you mention $\Vert\delta\Vert_p$ (no square): in section A or for $L^{\infty}$ attack. Furthermore, Szegedy et al. also used it without square.
Questions:
Thanks and congrats for achieving your goal:
Élie
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: