Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

L2 regularization term is squared. Why here specifically? Which impact? #52

Open
ego-thales opened this issue Jan 10, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@ego-thales
Copy link

Hello @carlini,

Reading through your paper and your code, I noticed that for the $L^2$ attack, you use a regularization term $\Vert\delta\Vert_2^2$. But all the time except one in your paper, you mention $\Vert\delta\Vert_p$ (no square): in section A or for $L^{\infty}$ attack. Furthermore, Szegedy et al. also used it without square.

Questions:

  1. Is this done purposefully?
  2. Is it discussed anywhere?
  3. Are you sure about the impact (or absence thereof) of the exponent on the results?

Thanks and congrats for achieving your goal:

We hope our attacks will be used as a benchmark in future defense attempts to create neural networks that resist adversarial examples.

Élie

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant