-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update our track strategy for the Kubeflow 1.9 release #895
Comments
Thank you for reporting us your feedback! The internal ticket has been created: https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/KF-5652.
|
Context(a) What should we do with the latest/stable track? Where should it point to and if it should even exist? OptionsFor (a), options are:
Conclusions:
|
thanks for the summary from tech topics @orfeas-k I've requested to change the default tracks for the bundle and charms. They are now in effect. The default tracks for the kubeflow bundle and charms have been changed to those corresponding to |
Pushed changesBased on the conclusion with the team, I pushed the following changes.
In response to:
I checked all of our docs, none of them are pointing to latest/beta or latest/candidate. |
I have filed #1126 to track closing the 1.7 channels once we check it is not being used, this issue can be closed now. |
Context
In recent releases we have not promoted charms to
latest/stable
in the charm repositories, leading to confusion. This was in part because we discussed removing thelatest
track entirely from our charms, instead opting to update our default track to whatever is the most recent release (say1.8
).We should define what we want (do we use
latest
at all? do we promote tolatest/stable
? etc) before the 1.9 releaseWhat needs to get done
Definition of Done
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: