Sorry for the delay, I've collated my feedback on the proposal and also the notes from our previous review call as:-

1. "phoneNumber" to be optional in the TelcoCreditScoringRequest (as this may come from a token for 3 legged calls)
2. "idDocument" to be optional in the TelcoCreditScoringRequest (not available in some countries, error raised when not provided in a country that requires it)
3. "telcoCreditScoringType" (in TelcoCreditScoringRequest) you mentioned to be optional and the MNO will provide a default implementation when it's not specified that it will use
4. Terminology

• We have the term ‘telco’ in the specification I wondering if these should be removed, as Camara is to appear less ‘telco’ orienated, should we drop the ‘telco’ prefix?
  -- Example: “telcoCreditScoringType” --> “CreditScoringType” which is not telco specific, infact the values it holds are industry terms.
• Do we need to lose the ‘Credit’ terminology (based on the sub-group naming discussion) as this could be used beyond credit as a generic ‘trust’ score (we probably need feedback from MNOs on this point as I think they should include a term):-
  -- Example: telcoCreditScoringValue--> scoringValue OR --> trustScoringValue

As commented in the meeting, next steps are:

• Points 1,2,3 we are aligned
• Check and align wording regarding point 4
• Work on ICM and Commonalilities alignment (update spec next week)