You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Problem description
When generating a binding process bindBlockchainPublicAddress, Telco Operators have mechanism to enforce the phoneNumber indicated is the one that applied by means of AuthN/AuthZ (checking Access Token is issued for that phoneNumber). However, there is no enforcement about the blockchainPublicAddress indicated really belongs to the user (i.e. person) under such phoneNumber.
A solution is needed for this enforcement
Possible evolution
Discussed within the issue
Alternative solution
Not indicated
Additional context
Details to be discussed under this issue
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Pedro & team,
I propose a solution to ensure the owner of the blockchainPublicAddress is the user binding their MSISDN,
perform a verification, where it is required, the user to sign a message with their private key to verify control over the blockchain address.
Background topic is to ensure that the binding perfomed is trusted (MSISDN-Blockchain relation is verified)
In TEF there are currently solutions (applied at App/Service) on beforehand, previously to attempt binding registration
DT indicates a solution in CAMARA/OGW should consider a way to allow for such a process
Talking during the meeting, need to be discussed further, could be options like sending an SMS to the user in order to inform him to about such a binding so as her/him can confirm that association.
Also point out the relevance of a compliance of the procedure with legality/privacy
PedroDiez
changed the title
Enhancement of blockchainPublicAddress belongs to the user whose phoneNumber is indicated to set-tp the binding relationship
Enhancement of blockchainPublicAddress belongs to the user whose phoneNumber is indicated to set-up the binding relationship
Nov 7, 2024
Problem description
When generating a binding process
bindBlockchainPublicAddress
, Telco Operators have mechanism to enforce the phoneNumber indicated is the one that applied by means of AuthN/AuthZ (checking Access Token is issued for that phoneNumber). However, there is no enforcement about theblockchainPublicAddress
indicated really belongs to the user (i.e. person) under such phoneNumber.A solution is needed for this enforcement
Possible evolution
Discussed within the issue
Alternative solution
Not indicated
Additional context
Details to be discussed under this issue
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: