-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CREATE ASSET FEES #16
Comments
The bitshares-ui repository is not the best place to discuss individual fees. I'm transferring the issue to the committee-tools repository. |
Note: this issue is due to #15. |
@noblenobert wrote:
On one hand, I don't think 2413 BTS is a lot for businesses with proper plans. On the other hand, I do think cheap multiple.token is the solution for businesses. It helps in recognition and branding for direct users of the BitShares platform. For indirect users, businesses can always remove the asset prefix from their own UI. @noblenobert wrote:
These are new features thus require a protocol upgrade (aka "hard fork"). It's better to discuss in https://github.com/bitshares/bsips. |
Noted however it will be nice if the cheap.multiple token could be implemented ASAP (edited by @abitmore for formatting) |
Noted |
The cheap multiple.token feature has been implemented for the 4.0 release. Please check the release notes: bitshares/bitshares-core#2026. |
Ok that's good to know |
Currently Create asset fees have been increased by a whopping 1000%
This pose a problem for small businesses and entrepreneurs who would love to create low risk tokens for projects or non-profit tokens for giveaways and memes. The solution of creating a one stop Token with subsequent price reduction for multiple.token is not enough.
Since the fee increase was as a result of the abuse of the low fee entry by rogue miscreants and fraudulent entities, I suggest that;
*** Asset creation fees
Longer Symbols: Lifetime Members 2413BTS/ Basic members 24130BTS***
The asset create feature is a very important part of the BTS platform that gives it a competitive edge as a well known DEX in the cryptosphere, I appeal to the committee and those in charge to review urgently this fee increase and take appropriate corrective measures before the next core release scheduled in June.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: