Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

tunnel instead of full-featured VPN? #8

Open
dimzon opened this issue Apr 23, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

tunnel instead of full-featured VPN? #8

dimzon opened this issue Apr 23, 2015 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@dimzon
Copy link

dimzon commented Apr 23, 2015

Isn't more easy/universal way just to implement some obfuscation tunnel so you can just re-use OpenVPN etc over it? Something like tor's obfsproxy?

This also mean you doesn't need VPN part so doesn't need tun/tap. So you can tunnel exisiting Windows/Mac OpenVPN via yours tunnel :)
@bigeagle
Copy link
Owner

Good Idea! I'd give a try.

@dimzon
Copy link
Author

dimzon commented Apr 23, 2015

I think it's possible to disassemble/refactor your project into 2 parts

  1. tunnel part - takes care of obfuscation/encryption/handshaking
  2. primitive VPN (no encryption/obfuscation) to work via tunnel
    this allows to re-use tunnel part in multiple scenarios
    this allows to re-use VPN part with different tunnels/protocols
    win-win solution ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bigeagle @dimzon