Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Literature review: Analyze all the imputation tools, and determine their strength and weaknesses. Describe what can be improved. #12

Open
davidonlaptop opened this issue Feb 4, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Literature review: Analyze all the imputation tools, and determine their strength and weaknesses. Describe what can be improved. #12

davidonlaptop opened this issue Feb 4, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees
@momozaza
Labels
in progress

Comments

@davidonlaptop
Copy link
Member

davidonlaptop commented Feb 4, 2016 •
edited
Loading

No description provided.

@davidonlaptop davidonlaptop changed the title List all the imputation tools + analyze their file formats + determine if we need to manage them Literature review: Analyze all the imputation tools, and determine their strength and weaknesses. May 12, 2016
@davidonlaptop davidonlaptop changed the title Literature review: Analyze all the imputation tools, and determine their strength and weaknesses. Literature review: Analyze all the imputation tools, and determine their strength and weaknesses. Describe what can be improved. May 12, 2016
@momozaza momozaza added in progress and removed ready labels Jun 2, 2016
@momozaza
Copy link

momozaza commented Jun 2, 2016

This should be based on ( http://omictools.com/genotype-imputation-category) and other information available

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@momozaza momozaza

Labels
in progress
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@davidonlaptop @momozaza