You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@satra (attn @cmaumet) points to "semantic conflict" between ad-hoc GeneratedBy in BIDS and formalized in BEP028 PROV record. Ideally there should be no such conflicts. I see two potential ways to address
rename BIDS's GeneratedBy into e.g. BIDSGeneratedBy (suggest better alternatives) and leave it as a simplified
worth explicitly listing/stating what would be missing to seamlessly convert to proper PROV GeneratedBy and potentially extend schema to include those fields
harmonize GeneratedBy to the PROV version.
question is either it is not too detailed/cumbersome and simplified version has merit to exist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
in prov there is a property (wasAttributedTo) that connects entities to agents. it's not generatedBy, which connects entities to activities. hence the mismatch in semantics.
I think we are "ok" in that sense of the semantic: there is "Description" field reserved which would/could describe the activity, as I have just done in my adjustment to the
We already have
GeneratedBy
field in BIDS: see e.g. https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/glossary.html#generatedby-metadata . It is a simplified / lightweight version of a more completeGeneratedBy
which is being proposed as part of the BEP028. For an example of it look at "Alternative representation for file-level provenance JSON-LD" section.In
@satra (attn @cmaumet) points to "semantic conflict" between ad-hoc GeneratedBy in BIDS and formalized in BEP028 PROV record. Ideally there should be no such conflicts. I see two potential ways to address
GeneratedBy
into e.g.BIDSGeneratedBy
(suggest better alternatives) and leave it as a simplifiedGeneratedBy
to the PROV version.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: