Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
The same content can be published in multiple orders, e.g. for an Orthodox audience or a Protestant audience. I'm OK with adding this back, but only if we do a redesign. In particular, I think we need to support:
For standard named orders, though, there may be little value to saying "this can be published in the following orders" - that's implicit. Who would stop you from doing so? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Versification could be extended to support:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Possibly consider:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We may want order in published DBL artifacts, but not decide we do not want order in project burritos. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I recently discovered the removal of canon specifications:
#277
If SB is to be used for the DBL in the future (e.g. uploading from Paratext), there is at least one use case (download as epub) for book order information. Chronological Bibles (sign language video) are also highly ordered publications that are non-standard orderings. Beyond that, I just wonder if SB does not include book ordering, what might that look like in terms of publishing partners who may need that information? Any ideas where they should get that, and who is responsible for doing it? If it should be a custom extension of SB, can someone provide an example of what that would look like? Or should it be a separate specification altogether?
Paratext Publishing Assistant (PA) also uses that information for creating printed Bible and print on demand files.
At some point I was aware that Paratext and (possibly Paratext Registry) were planning to have a translator-friendly way for translators to specify how they'd like to see their books published (including order) and that this would be a part of their translation milestones.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions