unit-tests are functionally useless due to Youtube anti-rip tech

[vxbinaca]

We need to move away from unit tests on sites with anti-ripping policies.

So no using sites like:

• Youtube - I mean it no youtube their anti-rip policies broke our unit tests.

• Vimeo - intermittent rip prevention not reliable for unit tests.

• TikTok - MOST aggressive rip prevention

• Instagram - High level of rip prevention

• Pornhub - intermittent rip prevention not reliable for unit tests.

• X - intermittent rip prevention not reliable for unit tests.

• Any site that throttles you and you need auth or cookies to bypass rate limits or IP bans

• Kick channel ingestion is currently broken in yt-dlp

• Twitch is a giant churning mass of deleted videos and banned accounts.

Video also needs to have open license, site needs to provide metadata from a player that is supported by yt-dlp because we don't want to end up like youtube-dl was a few years back ripping a Taylor Swift video in their unit tests. No direct links to a random .mp4 file. We need a youtube-like site that doesn't rip throttle.

[orkeilius]

Like I say in the commit comment, you could use unit test integrated mocking system to mock yt-dlp module.
Like you already do with request-mock, instead of testing yt-dlp you just send the expected result when a yt-dlp function is call