You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The proposal is to be able to add organizations in addition to projects to the .yml file, and a a score that combines the score of its own projects in a unique score evaluating the organization "reputation".
The expected behavior would be to be able to add a section configurations to the projects.yaml file. The schema would be equivalent to the one for projects. The only difference would be how the score is calculated.
Problem and motivation:
When evaluating tools and projects, it is common to also evaluate organizations, companies, foundations, etc. behind the project. You can have a very trendy project but that is developed by a single person with no track record. When adopting technology, the following evidences use to be taking into account:
track record of the organization
number of contributors (total and long-term)
active projects
high quality projects
etc.
For instance, for two similar projects in term of by-project quality, I might trust better a project belonging to apache foundation that a single-developer endeavour.
Is this something you're interested in working on?
Yes, I could collaborate in the definition, and testing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature description:
The proposal is to be able to add organizations in addition to projects to the .yml file, and a a score that combines the score of its own projects in a unique score evaluating the organization "reputation".
The expected behavior would be to be able to add a section
configurations
to theprojects.yaml
file. The schema would be equivalent to the one for projects. The only difference would be how the score is calculated.Problem and motivation:
When evaluating tools and projects, it is common to also evaluate organizations, companies, foundations, etc. behind the project. You can have a very trendy project but that is developed by a single person with no track record. When adopting technology, the following evidences use to be taking into account:
For instance, for two similar projects in term of by-project quality, I might trust better a project belonging to
apache foundation
that a single-developer endeavour.Is this something you're interested in working on?
Yes, I could collaborate in the definition, and testing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: