Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test units / suite? #10

Open
cusspvz opened this issue Apr 23, 2015 · 8 comments
Open

test units / suite? #10

cusspvz opened this issue Apr 23, 2015 · 8 comments

Comments

@cusspvz
Copy link

cusspvz commented Apr 23, 2015

I've issued because stability and performance are my top criteria.

@haoxins
Copy link

haoxins commented Apr 23, 2015

+1

1 similar comment
@Charca
Copy link

Charca commented Apr 25, 2015

+1

@stephnr
Copy link

stephnr commented Apr 25, 2015

I am willing to help with writing unit tests. Is there a consensus for framework of choice?

I would prefer either of the following:

  1. Mocha
  2. Jasmine

All wrapped in Karma

@cromulus
Copy link

cromulus commented May 1, 2015

👍

@kitten
Copy link

kitten commented May 4, 2015

As I've stated in #31, we could try to utilise Jest. It's based on Jasmine, but like its website says very painless to use.

@stephnr
Copy link

stephnr commented May 5, 2015

Please see #31 for the new branch using the Jest testing framework as proposed by @philplckthun. Thank you for the advice. This was exactly what I needed. Jasmine alone did not provide enough functionality for CLI support. I look forward to seeing everyones contributions 👍

@gmac
Copy link

gmac commented Jun 2, 2015

Yep, another 👍 on this. Its a glaring omission when a tool in consideration doesn't ship with a robust test suite.

@stephnr
Copy link

stephnr commented Jun 2, 2015

For those who do wish to contribute, the Testing branch can be located here:

https://github.com/Stephn-R/sprint

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants