You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 18, 2023. It is now read-only.
The standard library versions of these behave monotonic, meaning that if I change the system clock while the program is running time.After and time.Timer still fire after the time I programmed them to. The mocked variants don't behave this way:
now:=time.Now()
mClock:=clock.NewMock()
mClock.Set(now)
ch:=mClock.After(10*time.Second)
mClock.Set(now.Add(-1*time.Minute))
mClock.Add(15*time.Second)
select {
case<-ch:
fmt.Println("it works!")
default:
fmt.Println("mocked After is not monotonic")
}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In terms of the mock pointers, how would you see this working? When the clock is set back, would we subtract that amount from all of the pending timers?
Also, I'm not sure how this relates to testing - the m.Set method isn't available on a "real" clock.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
The standard library versions of these behave monotonic, meaning that if I change the system clock while the program is running
time.After
andtime.Timer
still fire after the time I programmed them to. The mocked variants don't behave this way:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: