Coexistence with Legacy IPv4 section #39
Closed
EduardVasilenko
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 3 comments
-
|
this section did not have "Next" and "Previous" buttons. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Yes, it seems like we should mention RFC8925 and the RIPE presentation in the description of NAT64/DNS64. That section needs a lot more text! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Closed as done |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi Brian,
There is 3rd approach for IPv6 transition: slow migration host-by-host over one link.
It is perfectly discussed in the RIPE research: https://ripe85.ripe.net/wp-content/uploads/presentations/9-RIPE85-Deploying_IPv6_mostly.pdf
It is when the host claims by DHCPv4: I would support IPv6-only, help me with DNS64/NAT64 to reach the outdated Internet.
I propose to mention it.
Eduard
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions