-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bundled libraries are not installed. #59
Comments
BTW: How is libsgllnx64-2.29.02.so obtained? Have you a pointer to the sources? |
Final note: libsgllnx64-2.29.02.so depends on libusb-0.1.so.4. This is strange, both latest upstream and the usually bleeding edge Fedora are on libusb-0.1.so.0. Perhaps the simplest solution would be to rebuild libsgllnx64 against thisi version which seems stable and generally available? EDIT: libusb-0.1.so.4 is not strange, it's readily available from upstream (version 0.1.5). Thus: the libusb dependency is not a problem.. |
Alec... Do I understand that all is well if we adopt your patch? |
OK, I understand.
Not yet... more testing needed. I'm on it. |
Last bit fixed with #65. Thanks for your efforts on this, most of which not visible on github. |
This is seen on the flatpak build, perhaps also on others.
The library libsgllnx64-2.29.02.so which lives under buildlinux64 is not included in the tarball, and thus missing in runtime. The symptoms are as described in #48. There is also lot's of console output about the missing, not found library.
Manually adding it resolves the first error and reveals a new: libsgllnx64-2.29.02.so depends on libusb-0.1.so.4 which is not generally available (outdated). We need to provide also this (or rebuild libsgllnx against a newer distro).
libusb does not seem to have any specific runtime deps.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: