Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dSYMs imported with dynamic xcframeworks are not part of the dsyms output group #2512

Open
aaronsky opened this issue Aug 19, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2625
Open

dSYMs imported with dynamic xcframeworks are not part of the dsyms output group #2512

aaronsky opened this issue Aug 19, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2625

Comments

@aaronsky
Copy link
Contributor

I've been investigating this for a little over a week, to try and understand the issue as fully as I can. Let me do my best to explain.

In my application I use PSPDFKit and Sentry. They are each provided as dynamic xcframeworks; containing a dSYMs path under each slice's directory and adjacent to the .framework, and a corresponding DebugSymbolsPath value in the xcframework Info.plist. As I understand it, this is a fairly typical arrangement when using -debug-symbols with xcodebuild -create-xcframework (especially when using Carthage as the builder).

In my Bazel project, these xcframeworks are imported using apple_dynamic_xcframework_import (from a repo created with http_archive, but I have confirmed this does not matter). When I go to build my application with the flags --apple_generate_dsym --output_groups=+dsyms, I see dSYMs from my ios_application, ios_extension, and ios_framework targets, but none from these apple_dynamic_xcframework_import targets. This appears to be called out explicitly in apple_xcframework_tests.bzl, though I am not versed enough in the ruleset to say how complex it would be to address.

Finally, this is reproducible in a rules_apple example – I tested with HelloWorldSwift importing Sentry and confirmed the dSYMs are not present in the outputs. Placing the xcframework in the same repo as the target does not change the behavior.

Any guidance on how to proceed would be appreciated!

@vakhidbetrakhmadov
Copy link
Contributor

+1, running into this issue as well

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants