Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for amplify override function #10644

Open
2 tasks
dreamorosi opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 5 comments
Open
2 tasks

Support for amplify override function #10644

dreamorosi opened this issue Jun 23, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
extensibility Issues related to expand or customize current configuration feature-request Request a new feature functions Issues tied to the functions category p3

Comments

@dreamorosi
Copy link

Is this feature request related to a new or existing Amplify category?

function

Is this related to another service?

No response

Describe the feature you'd like to request

It would be great to have support for amplify override function, this would allow to extend functions as the configurations available at the moment are pretty limited.

I know it's possible to manually configure the function's settings as described in this guide from the docs, but manually editing a Cfn template is far from ideal.

Allowing this type of override would allow to configure settings like timeout, active tracing, and memory allocation - which has an direct impact on cost; as well as newer things like function urls.

Additionally, and especially for X-Ray Active tracing, this could/should be part of the advanced settings flow. Tracing is much more important in production than other things that are available today (i.e. invoking a function on schedule).

Describe the solution you'd like

amplify override function

Additionally, only for X-Ray tracing, have this value as advanced setting.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Manually updating the CloudFormation template, which is messy and overly complex for content creation / enablement scenarios.

Additional context

No response

Is this something that you'd be interested in working on?

  • 👋 I may be able to implement this feature request

Would this feature include a breaking change?

  • ⚠️ This feature might incur a breaking change
@josefaidt josefaidt added functions Issues tied to the functions category feature-request Request a new feature extensibility Issues related to expand or customize current configuration labels Jun 23, 2022
@josefaidt
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @dreamorosi 👋 thanks for raising this! I've marked this as a feature request for the team to evaluate further 🙂

@josefaidt josefaidt added the p3 label Jul 13, 2022
@danielvouch
Copy link

Is there any progress on this?

@electronicalias
Copy link

We would like this to be able to easily add Lambda functions to VPCs, without having to modify the CloudFormation.

@espetro
Copy link

espetro commented Apr 12, 2024

Bump

1 similar comment
@sherlack-lih
Copy link

Bump

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
extensibility Issues related to expand or customize current configuration feature-request Request a new feature functions Issues tied to the functions category p3
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants