Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closes #275 #276

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

mstackhouse
Copy link

@mstackhouse mstackhouse commented Oct 18, 2024

Thank you for your Pull Request!

We have developed a Pull Request template to aid you and our reviewers. Completing the below tasks helps to ensure our reviewers can maximize their time on your code as well as making sure the xportr codebase remains robust and consistent.

The scope of {xportr}

{xportr}'s scope is to enable R users to write out submission compliant xpt files that can be delivered to a Health Authority or to downstream validation software programs. We see labels, lengths, types, ordering and formats from a dataset specification object (SDTM and ADaM) as being our primary focus. We also see messaging and warnings to users around applying information from the specification file as a primary focus. Please make sure your Pull Request meets this scope of {xportr}. If your Pull Request moves beyond this scope, please get in touch with the {xportr} team on slack or create an issue to discuss.

Please check off each task box as an acknowledgment that you completed the task. This checklist is part of the Github Action workflows and the Pull Request will not be merged into the main branch until you have checked off each task.

Changes Description

Resolve issues indicated in #275

Task List

  • The spirit of xportr is met in your Pull Request
  • Place Closes #<insert_issue_number> into the beginning of your Pull Request Title (Use Edit button in top-right if you need to update)
  • Summary of changes filled out in the above Changes Description. Can be removed or left blank if changes are minor/self-explanatory.
  • Code is formatted according to the tidyverse style guide. Use styler package and functions to style files accordingly.
  • New functions or arguments follow established convention found in the Wiki.
  • Updated relevant unit tests or have written new unit tests. See our Wiki for conventions used in this package.
  • Creation/updated relevant roxygen headers and examples. See our Wiki for conventions used in this package.
  • Run devtools::document() so all .Rd files in the man folder and the NAMESPACE file in the project root are updated appropriately
  • Run pkgdown::build_site() and check that all affected examples are displayed correctly and that all new/updated functions occur on the "Reference" page.
  • Update NEWS.md if the changes pertain to a user-facing function (i.e. it has an @export tag) or documentation aimed at users (rather than developers)
  • The NEWS.md entry should go under the # xportr development version section. Don't worry about updating the version because it will be auto-updated using the vbump.yaml CI.
  • Address any updates needed for vignettes and/or templates.
  • Link the issue Development Panel so that it closes after successful merging.
  • The developer is responsible for fixing merge conflicts not the Reviewer.
  • Pat yourself on the back for a job well done! Much love to your accomplishment!

@bms63
Copy link
Collaborator

bms63 commented Oct 24, 2024

@mstackhouse I feel like we might of found the same bug.

I am working on a workshop for P/Pharma and types and formats are not working as expected.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: xportr_type() doesn't respect the xportr.variable_name and xportr.type_name options
3 participants