Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Current issues #125

Open
arminask opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Current issues #125

arminask opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@arminask
Copy link
Owner

arminask commented Aug 27, 2024

  • Website load time.
    (Unrelated, issue was on my end)

  • Resources page layout/design needs to be improved
    I don't particularly like the way it looks right now, what do others think?
    This page could also include other docs to ARM related things.

  • Inconsistencies with the application subtitles
    I currently find the software labeling a bit messy. Some apps have architecture labels, some do not,
    some have the software description, some don't. I think agreeing on a standardized subtitle formatting would
    be more consistent across all the apps?

These are just my thoughts written, so that I don't forget. You're welcome to agree or disagree on them.

@talynone
Copy link

For me the website loads instantly, but I have a pretty good Internet connection. The png files are already pretty small, you could try re-write the website so it only loads images on demand when scrolled into.

https://css-tricks.com/lazy-loading-images-with-vue-js-directives-and-intersection-observer/

@lexcyn
Copy link
Contributor

lexcyn commented Aug 28, 2024

@arminask I agree with the subtitles. This would be very beneficial if they had a tag saying native, ARM64EC or even web app (neutral arch).

The page loads pretty instant for me but I am on 1.5Gbps fiber :)

@arminask
Copy link
Owner Author

My internet is 1Gbps up/down fiber. Strangely enough I cannot replicate this issue anymore. It probably was my browser/cache or an Ad Blocking extension.

@iKineticate
Copy link
Contributor

I've noticed that within some categories, there are software entries with similar functionalities that are not grouped together. For example:

  • Software 1 and Software 2 both offer [specific functionality], yet they are listed separately.

  • Grouping these similar software together could enhance user experience and make it easier to compare options.

I suggest considering a reorganization of these entries to enhance clarity and user experience.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants