Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ffpcol seeming to keep as rows and order of opreations in script #2

Open
Rob-murphys opened this issue Sep 13, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@Rob-murphys
Copy link

Rob-murphys commented Sep 13, 2021

After inspecting the output of ffpcol the file is just the same as the output of ffpaa just without the imer showing also, just the number. is this the expected behaviour?

Secondly, when running for example:

ffpry -l 5 *.fna | ffpcol > vectors
for i in $(seq 1 1 20)
	do
	ffpboot vectors | ffprwn | ffpjsd > matrix.$i
	done

Is the combining the output of ffpry from every .fna in the directory into a single vector?

Given my understanding from reading the -h of the tools, it should be possible to run a separate operation for easy .fna in a directory and then combine right before ffpjsd? I however assume I am wrong looking at the above example!

Lastly does ffpboot run a single bootstrap permutation? That being one random selection of values from the ffp vector?

@Rob-murphys Rob-murphys changed the title ffpcol seeming to keep as rows? ffpcol seeming to keep as rows and order of opreations in script Sep 13, 2021
@apetkau
Copy link
Owner

apetkau commented Sep 13, 2021

Thanks for the questions @Lamm-a .

You may want to try to contact the original authors to answer some of these. The readme file lists:

Copyright (C) 2009-2012
Author: Gregory E. Sims

Report Bugs to [email protected]

However, I do not know how up-to-date this contact information is.

This repository mainly contains some small changes I made to the original software when I was using it long ago. I have not used all of the components you are asking about so I don't really have any good answers for you. Sorry about that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants