Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Idea for new Plugin "Suggest TOTP" #81

Open
OLLI-S opened this issue Aug 15, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Idea for new Plugin "Suggest TOTP" #81

OLLI-S opened this issue Aug 15, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@OLLI-S
Copy link

OLLI-S commented Aug 15, 2019

Hello Andrew,

I did not find a way to leave you here a personal message, so I am creating an issue.

I am using 2FA in KeePass and I would love to see a plugin that looks at the Two Factor Auth List and tells me what entries in KeePass support 2FA but I have not yet set up 2FA.
See my posting Idea for new Plugin "Suggest TOTP" in the KeePass forums for more details.

Why am I contacting you?
You already coded the HaveIBeenPwned plugin.
And this plugin is similar (look up data online and compare it with KeePass).

I would really love to have such a plugin because looking the 2FA list manually showed that I have many entries where I should set up 2FA.
And I would donate 50 Euro (I am a private user, not a company) for your effort.

Best regards

Oliver Sahr

@ArminWeb
Copy link

ArminWeb commented Sep 8, 2019

I would love to see such a plugin that tells me where 2FA is available and not yet added.
So thumbs up!

@nidunc
Copy link

nidunc commented Jun 18, 2021

In case the people who commented in this issue are still interested in such a plugin and haven’t found one yet, @tiuub created one a while ago that does just that. It downloads all websites supporting 2FA from https://2fa.directory/ and shows whether entries support 2FA in a column. Additionally, one can check a single entry and search for websites.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants