Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Seperate Proving from Execution #77

Open
austbot opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Seperate Proving from Execution #77

austbot opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@austbot
Copy link
Contributor

austbot commented Oct 28, 2024

As and output of #27 , we need to separate the execution of the guest and the proving of the trace into separate stages of the pipeline.

Currently what happens is Ingester notifies the runner, which then tries to claim the execution, we will try to resolve public inputs and determine if this image is worth running and proving, if so we try to claim, then if we win the claim we try to resolve any private inputs, then we send all this to the prover to execute and prove. In this flow we execute and prove right away. Useful information, such as execution cycles, proof segments is lost and not available to the decision to claim the compute or not.

The new flow needs to separate the prover from execution.

@austbot austbot self-assigned this Nov 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant