-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Homebrew package on homebrew/fuse tap for procfs #6
Comments
I do a bunch of homebrew stuff; and need /proc back :) So I am willing to formula it when you say it's ready to release. I'll write a -HEAD formula to test; but would love procfs.rb to be back! Cloning now. |
Go for it. Other than the 3 documented bugs in the issues list, it runs fine as far as I know. I've added you as a collaborator. |
Any news on getting this done? I'm having trouble with 10.12 compilation and would love a nice steady reproducible install of |
Hey guys..... I plan on doing this... I'm just defending my PhD on August 11th. And have a <2yo. So time/sleep/food are priority. Queued. Still live |
Needed a break of edits... hacked on this a bit: The formula is at (WIP): L14 is definitely needed, L15 is to try to figure out why Gist: https://gist.github.com/247c5201b20a09317250b4813e5c8ba5 I'm on it's in brew:
versus my "classic"
|
Arg, I need a working /proc procfs on macOS High Sierra. |
IIRC I was using brew's "classic" pcre. Did you find any changes I needed to merge? This should build, if you update the |
@danielbair I've updated the Makefile to use the generic SDK ( @BenjaminHCCarr I believe the pcrecpp::string was due to the implicit use of |
Homebrew has an awesome repository of FUSE filesystems for OS X on the homebrew/fuse tap.
From the formula guidelines, I think the only change we need is to have our Makefile install the
procfs
binary and plist to the right Homebrew directory. But that said, our source could use some tidying.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: