-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Matching Strategy SemanticId #473
Comments
2024-10-30 TF AAS Metamodel Decision Proposal
• With exact matching,the references of the two semantic IDs need to exact match as described in Clause "Matching Strategy for References". Additionally introduce value match for semanticId with Example Correct
to
|
2024-11-14 Workstream AAS Non-Normative chapter, therefore remove Default recommendation |
* fix formatting * #480 add example with referredSemanticId * extension of #480: added invalid examples for all constraints for References * closes #471 different syntax intelligent matching * closes #473 Matching semanticId value-match and exact match * closes #479 supplementalSemanticId and isCaseOf * see #479 now isCaseOf included in strategy * add note that implementations may differ Co-authored-by: s-heppner <[email protected]> * grammar * fix typo Co-authored-by: s-heppner <[email protected]> * exact match for semanticIc + formatting --------- Co-authored-by: s-heppner <[email protected]>
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
There are different matching strategies described for semantic IDs. What is not clear from the example is whether the key.type should be considered or not in exact matching etc. (see chapter on reference matching: these two matching strategies need to be combined).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: