You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, your work inspires me. How does 3D-RecGAN++ get the IoU of 323 voxels, 643 voxels in tables? I think that the output is 2563 voxels by main_3D-RecGAN++.py.
We observe that the channels of 323 voxels, 643 voxels, 1283 voxels are respectively 64, 16, 8 in the architecture of 3D-RecGAN++. Is the average IoU of the channels, i.e., the IoU of 323 voxles is the average IoU of 64 channels of 323 voxels?
Thanks very much, look forward to your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hi @caixialiu-bjut, if you need to compute the IoU of 32^3 or 64^3, you can downsample the predicted 256^3 voxels to 32^3 or 64^3. The intermediate layers are features, not voxel results.
Hi, your work inspires me. How does 3D-RecGAN++ get the IoU of 323 voxels, 643 voxels in tables? I think that the output is 2563 voxels by main_3D-RecGAN++.py.
We observe that the channels of 323 voxels, 643 voxels, 1283 voxels are respectively 64, 16, 8 in the architecture of 3D-RecGAN++. Is the average IoU of the channels, i.e., the IoU of 323 voxles is the average IoU of 64 channels of 323 voxels?
Thanks very much, look forward to your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: