You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When it is recommended to use "detect_cnv.pl -test" and "detect_cnv.pl -validate"?
I ran "detect_cnv.pl -test" in 2000 cattle samples on 100K and I got all the frequencies for all the CNV regions discovered. After that, I ran "detect_cnv.pl -validate" on the same samples, using the prior frequencies for all the CNV regions discovered in the "test" step. However, the "validate" algorithm has called much more deletions and duplications, for the fixed regions, that haven't been detected by the HMM algorithm, i.e., for sample1-region1 there was no CNV using "detect_cnv.pl -test" but a duplication using "validate". Could you help me understand when using "test" and "validate" and why a difference in the results?
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
When it is recommended to use "detect_cnv.pl -test" and "detect_cnv.pl -validate"?
I ran "detect_cnv.pl -test" in 2000 cattle samples on 100K and I got all the frequencies for all the CNV regions discovered. After that, I ran "detect_cnv.pl -validate" on the same samples, using the prior frequencies for all the CNV regions discovered in the "test" step. However, the "validate" algorithm has called much more deletions and duplications, for the fixed regions, that haven't been detected by the HMM algorithm, i.e., for sample1-region1 there was no CNV using "detect_cnv.pl -test" but a duplication using "validate". Could you help me understand when using "test" and "validate" and why a difference in the results?
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: