Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 21, 2024. It is now read-only.

Changing the scope of coverageType #94

Open
sroosa opened this issue Nov 5, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Changing the scope of coverageType #94

sroosa opened this issue Nov 5, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@sroosa
Copy link

sroosa commented Nov 5, 2014

During the controlled vocabulary review we were thinking it would be useful to be able to identify the type of coverage beyond simply spatial or temporal; for example, georeference, geoname, Date range, century, period, etc.
One suggestion was that we move the spatial/temporal vocab terms to an attribute, while providing the more specific terms in the coverageType element.
Or the spatial/temporal could be implied by the more specific coverageType term.

@sroosa
Copy link
Author

sroosa commented Nov 11, 2014

More on this from @AllisonAnn :
What I’ve suggested is that the current recommended vocab for CoverageType (spatial, temporal) could be tied to a pbcoreCoverage container element, containing a nested Coverage element tied to a special vocab for either spatial or temporal data, and an added Note element.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants