-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support Flatpak. #287
Comments
Hello, thanks for your suggestion. I might look into flatpak, but is there something wrong with the Appimage package that's already provided for download? Does it not work for you? |
"http://github.com/VioletGiraffe/file-commander/issues/287#issuecomment-1002793730#:~:text=edited-,Hello%2C%20thanks%20for%20your,consequently%20are%20frequently%20superior.,-BEEDELLROKEJULIANLOCKHART%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20changed%20the" responds to "http://github.com/VioletGiraffe/file-commander/issues/287#issuecomment-1002650929#:~:text=hello%2C%20thanks%20for%20your%20suggestion.%20i%20might%20look%20into%20flatpak%2C%20but%20is%20there%20something%20wrong%20with%20the%20appimage%20package%20that's%20already%20provided%20for%20download%3F%20does%20it%20not%20work%20for%20you%3F".
@VioletGiraffe, dissimilarly to AppImage, textual management of Additionally, they are able to be – and frequently and usually are – more secure and more supportive of new features, and always more conservant of space, because they are able to share some dependencies. This is similar to regular packages for Linux, but they are able to operate via approximately any operating-system that utilizes "http://github.com/systemd/systemd", and consequently are frequently superior. |
Superb. Thanks. @VioletGiraffe, where is it available at? https://flathub.org/apps/search/file%20commander doesn't show anything, nor does https://github.com/VioletGiraffe/file-commander/releases/tag/0.9.4.14.1. |
Sorry, I have not looked into flatpak as AppImage does the job. Please feel free to contribute flatpak support if you'd like to! |
My rationale is available at https://github.com/safing/portmaster-packaging/issues/43#issue-956312378#:~:text=It%20shall%20allow,to%20support%20this.
I am thankful for any assistance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: