Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Flatpak. #287

Closed
RokeJulianLockhart opened this issue Dec 29, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Support Flatpak. #287

RokeJulianLockhart opened this issue Dec 29, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@RokeJulianLockhart
Copy link

RokeJulianLockhart commented Dec 29, 2021

My rationale is available at https://github.com/safing/portmaster-packaging/issues/43#issue-956312378#:~:text=It%20shall%20allow,to%20support%20this.

I am thankful for any assistance.

@VioletGiraffe
Copy link
Owner

Hello, thanks for your suggestion. I might look into flatpak, but is there something wrong with the Appimage package that's already provided for download? Does it not work for you?

@RokeJulianLockhart
Copy link
Author

RokeJulianLockhart commented Dec 29, 2021

"http://github.com/VioletGiraffe/file-commander/issues/287#issuecomment-1002793730#:~:text=edited-,Hello%2C%20thanks%20for%20your,consequently%20are%20frequently%20superior.,-BEEDELLROKEJULIANLOCKHART%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20changed%20the" responds to "http://github.com/VioletGiraffe/file-commander/issues/287#issuecomment-1002650929#:~:text=hello%2C%20thanks%20for%20your%20suggestion.%20i%20might%20look%20into%20flatpak%2C%20but%20is%20there%20something%20wrong%20with%20the%20appimage%20package%20that's%20already%20provided%20for%20download%3F%20does%20it%20not%20work%20for%20you%3F".

Hello, thanks for your suggestion. I might look into flatpak, but is there something wrong with the Appimage package that's already provided for download? Does it not work for you?

@VioletGiraffe, dissimilarly to AppImage, textual management of flatpak-packages is possible, which is able to allow more consistent distribution and deployment / general management.

Additionally, they are able to be – and frequently and usually are – more secure and more supportive of new features, and always more conservant of space, because they are able to share some dependencies. This is similar to regular packages for Linux, but they are able to operate via approximately any operating-system that utilizes "http://github.com/systemd/systemd", and consequently are frequently superior.

@RokeJulianLockhart RokeJulianLockhart changed the title Please do support flatpak. Please support Flatpak. Mar 27, 2022
@RokeJulianLockhart RokeJulianLockhart changed the title Please support Flatpak. Support flatpak. Aug 5, 2022
@RokeJulianLockhart
Copy link
Author

RokeJulianLockhart commented Jan 11, 2023

Superb. Thanks. @VioletGiraffe, where is it available at? https://flathub.org/apps/search/file%20commander doesn't show anything, nor does https://github.com/VioletGiraffe/file-commander/releases/tag/0.9.4.14.1.

@VioletGiraffe
Copy link
Owner

VioletGiraffe commented Jan 12, 2023

Sorry, I have not looked into flatpak as AppImage does the job. Please feel free to contribute flatpak support if you'd like to!
But I appreciate your detailed explanation of why flatpak is better.

@VioletGiraffe VioletGiraffe closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 12, 2023
@RokeJulianLockhart RokeJulianLockhart changed the title Support flatpak. Support Flatpak. Feb 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants