Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Apotheosis compatibility #4700

Closed
iamtyroon opened this issue Feb 29, 2024 · 9 comments
Closed

Apotheosis compatibility #4700

iamtyroon opened this issue Feb 29, 2024 · 9 comments

Comments

@iamtyroon
Copy link

Compatibility Issue with Apotheosis
In Apotheosis one is able to change the power of an enchantment e.g.:(fortune 3 - fortune 7). But quark limits the enchanting power to (VI) because of the Ancient tomes. Any way i can fix this would be highly appreciated .

@LeoBeliik
Copy link
Contributor

In what version? In 1.20 and at least 1.19 ancient tomes work with apo, even let you over enchant +1 to apotheosis max level

@iamtyroon
Copy link
Author

in 1.20,1 forge 47.1.3

@Devilswarchild
Copy link

I have a question along the lines of apotheosis compat... do the apo enchantments work with the matrix enchanting?

@iamtyroon
Copy link
Author

Ive never tried matrix enchanting its usually disabled but i remember one time it crashed when i turned it on idk if its good rn tho

@Devilswarchild
Copy link

it didnt crash for me, it was brought up as an issue with apotheosis in the latest build of my modpack, so I thought I would ask here.

@iamtyroon
Copy link
Author

Matrix enchanting cant work one on one with the apotheosis enchanting you have to choose one.I prefer the apotheosis

@Devilswarchild
Copy link

Matrix enchanting cant work one on one with the apotheosis enchanting you have to choose one.I prefer the apotheosis

yeah I ultimately made the decision to just remove oddities

@iamtyroon
Copy link
Author

In what version? In 1.20 and at least 1.19 ancient tomes work with apo, even let you over enchant +1 to apotheosis max level

Any update

@LeoBeliik
Copy link
Contributor

Like I said in my prev comment, this just seems to work normally? Unless I'm misunderstanding the problem

imagen
imagen

this goes for #4642 too

@Vazkii Vazkii closed this as completed Mar 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants