You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So like, already there's some rudimentary support for multiple facilitators at the same time. but what can we do to better utilize >1 facilitator? e.g. what if we were to sort of group the responses to a prompt after they've come in and do something based on this grouping. like maybe a minority opinion deserves more attention, and maybe a popular opinion deserves a little less. If a facilitator could sort of "bin" the thoughts into a few groups, it would (1) draw attention to how issues are really never 2-sided, and (2) if we then only refer to the different "camps" then we may not pay as much attention to how many "votes" there are in each (bc of the number of thoughts that fall under it)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So like, already there's some rudimentary support for multiple facilitators at the same time. but what can we do to better utilize >1 facilitator? e.g. what if we were to sort of group the responses to a prompt after they've come in and do something based on this grouping. like maybe a minority opinion deserves more attention, and maybe a popular opinion deserves a little less. If a facilitator could sort of "bin" the thoughts into a few groups, it would (1) draw attention to how issues are really never 2-sided, and (2) if we then only refer to the different "camps" then we may not pay as much attention to how many "votes" there are in each (bc of the number of thoughts that fall under it)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: