Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

targeted seq #10

Open
monaallouba opened this issue Nov 23, 2023 · 8 comments
Open

targeted seq #10

monaallouba opened this issue Nov 23, 2023 · 8 comments

Comments

@monaallouba
Copy link

Thank you very much for developing this useful code. Does it work on targeted sequencing data too?

@eipVCCRI
Copy link
Contributor

Hi there,

We have not tested dv-trio with targeted sequencing data, but I believe it should still work.

However, this cannot be guaranteed. As long as input files formats are followed, I think it should work.

Please let us know what you find if you decide to continue and try your targeted sequencing data.

Thanks.
Eddie

@monaallouba
Copy link
Author

monaallouba commented Nov 26, 2023 via email

@eipVCCRI
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Mona,

We have a computation time comparison, which includes using exome data in our paper:

Eddie K K Ip, Clinton Hadinata, Joshua W K Ho, Eleni Giannoulatou
dv-trio: a family-based variant calling pipeline using DeepVariant
Bioinformatics, Volume 36, Issue 11, June 2020, Pages 3549–3551, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa116

under Supplementary Table S1: Computation time and memory usage comparison of alternative trio calling approaches.

Thanks
Eddie

@monaallouba
Copy link
Author

monaallouba commented Nov 26, 2023 via email

@monaallouba
Copy link
Author

monaallouba commented Nov 27, 2023 via email

@eipVCCRI
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Mona,

I cannot think of a reason for one sample to be still doing the DeepVariant step. If you kill the process, without killing the instance, maybe you can see the error file and work out where within the DeepVariant step the 3rd bam is stuck in.

That's the only thing I can think of at the moment.
Eddie

@monaallouba
Copy link
Author

monaallouba commented Nov 28, 2023 via email

@eipVCCRI
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Mona,

It looks like no output files were produced from the deepvariant runs, as noted by the error messages of "no such file or directory" when looking for the output.g.vcf.gz files.

I'm actually not in the office at this moment, so cannot really help in checking.

Is this run log from when the process was stuck for one of the bams?

I assume you may already have closed the instance, so there is no way to check if any output files were created for those 2 bams that you mentioned ran successfully. If you have not close the instance could you check, or run the trio again?

I might be able to help more when I come back into the office, but that would be some time from now.

Eddie

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants