-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
be/VERB is suspect #404
Comments
@amir-zeldes If "there is..." should stay VERB, what about "there seems to be"? |
Used the following DepEdit script: ; AUX for "be" (excl. "there is", "there seems to be")
lemma=/be/&upos=/VERB/;xpos=/EX/ #1>#2 #1:storage=has_expl
lemma=/be/&upos=/VERB/&func=/xcomp/;xpos=/EX/;func=/.*/ #3>#1;#3>#2 #1:storage=has_expl
lemma=/be/&upos=/VERB/&storage!=/has_expl/ none #1:upos=AUX |
Related: "do", "have" VERB->AUX #403 |
A few more where the tag doesn't match the tree (excepting tag questions)—AUX should be VERB for existential, or copula is incorrectly promoted: https://universal.grew.fr/?custom=64bca7e416fb4 |
@amir-zeldes Does the above (extending to existentials in an |
LGTM, incorporating into GUM |
Many of these look like they should be AUX, stranded due to ellipsis (cf. #403).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: