Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Definition of sdmx:MetadataProperty (http://purl.org/linked-data/sdmx#MetadataProperty) #3

Open
aucampia opened this issue Sep 3, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@aucampia
Copy link

aucampia commented Sep 3, 2021

I have looked around and I can't find any official definition of sdmx:MetadataProperty. I have found this however: https://code.google.com/archive/p/publishing-statistical-data/wikis/IssueMetadata.wiki

And in there:

sdmx:MetadataProperty a rdfs:Class, owl:Class;
    rdfs:label "Metadata property"@en;
    rdfs:comment """Class of properties used to provide metadata values in 
                    metadata reports (sdmx:MetadataSet)"""@en;
    rdfs:subClassOf sdmx:ComponentProperty;
    owl:disjointWith sdmx:MeasureProperty;
    owl:disjointWith sdmx:AttributeProperty;
    owl:disjointWith sdmx:DimensionProperty;
    .

Could you integrate this into this repo? Not sure where would be best, but it should be somewhere. I think sdmx.ttl would make the most sense.

@der
Copy link
Contributor

der commented Sep 4, 2021

I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve. This repo has no official standing. As it says in the README, this draft RDF representation of SDMX was been superseded by the RDF data cube vocabulary.

The definition of sdmx:MetadataProperty was part of the original sketch for how to represent the MSD (as opposed to DSD) elements of sdmx. So in the interests of making that part of the obsoleted design wiki easier to find I've added an sdmx-msd.ttl file here with the original sketch properties for that taken from the wiki. ede5e32

@aucampia
Copy link
Author

aucampia commented Sep 6, 2021

I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve.

I want to use sdmx-code:ConfStatus-C to annotate data, and my plan was to put it in sdmx-metadata:conf, but I have decided to use sdmx-attribute:conf instead.

This repo has no official standing. As it says in the README, this draft RDF representation of SDMX was been superseded by the RDF data cube vocabulary.

VOCAB-QB does refer to sdmx-code (http://purl.org/linked-data/sdmx/2009/code#) and sdmx-attribute (http://purl.org/linked-data/sdmx/2009/attribute#) which links to this repository. And it includes examples such as:

eg:slice1 a qb:Slice;
    qb:sliceStructure  eg:sliceByRegion ;
    eg:refPeriod               <http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-interval/2004-01-01T00:00:00/P3Y> ;
    sdmx-dimension:sex         sdmx-code:sex-M ;
    qb:observation eg:o11, eg:o12, eg:o13, eg:o14 ;
    .

Though the only reference made to sdmx-metadata is in some example, so I guess it is best to avoid that, and I will. Maybe it is best to reach out to data cube working group and see what to make of sdmx references.

@der
Copy link
Contributor

der commented Sep 6, 2021

VOCAB-QB does refer to sdmx-code (http://purl.org/linked-data/sdmx/2009/code#) and sdmx-attribute (http://purl.org/linked-data/sdmx/2009/attribute#) which links to this repository. And it includes examples such as:

It does but those are informative examples. There's no (or at least not meant to be) any normative reference to the sdmx vocabularies.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants