Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for variables with changing size with dot_tilde #700

Open
mhauru opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Support for variables with changing size with dot_tilde #700

mhauru opened this issue Oct 28, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@mhauru
Copy link
Member

mhauru commented Oct 28, 2024

Currently a variable that expands in size between iterations crashes `dot_tilde:

MWE:

using Random, DynamicPPL, Distributions

Random.seed!(23)

@model function dynamic_model_with_dot_tilde(num_zs=10)
    z = Vector(undef, num_zs)
    z .~ Exponential(1.0)
    num_ms = Int(round(sum(z)))
    @show num_ms
    m = Vector(undef, num_ms)
    return m .~ Normal(1.0, 1.0)
end
m = dynamic_model_with_dot_tilde()

vi = VarInfo(m)
for k in keys(vi)
    set_flag!(vi, k, "del")
end
m(vi)

Output:

num_ms = 8
num_ms = 11
ERROR: KeyError: key m[9] not found
Stacktrace:
  [1] getindex
    @ ./dict.jl:498 [inlined]
  [2] getidx
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/varinfo.jl:605 [inlined]
  [3] is_flagged
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/varinfo.jl:1940 [inlined]
  [4] istrans
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/varinfo.jl:1073 [inlined]
  [5] istrans
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/varinfo.jl:1072 [inlined]
  [6] from_maybe_linked_internal_transform
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/abstract_varinfo.jl:828 [inlined]
  [7] to_maybe_linked_internal_transform
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/abstract_varinfo.jl:881 [inlined]
  [8] get_and_set_val!(rng::TaskLocalRNG, vi::TypedVarInfo{@NamedTuple{z::DynamicPPL.Metadata{…}, m::DynamicPPL.Metadata{…}}, Float64}, vns::Vector{VarName{:m, Accessors.IndexLens{…}}}, dists::Normal{Float64}, spl::SampleFromPrior)
    @ DynamicPPL ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/context_implementations.jl:574
  [9] dot_assume(rng::TaskLocalRNG, spl::SampleFromPrior, dists::Normal{Float64}, vns::Vector{VarName{:m, Accessors.IndexLens{…}}}, var::Vector{Any}, vi::TypedVarInfo{@NamedTuple{z::DynamicPPL.Metadata{…}, m::DynamicPPL.Metadata{…}}, Float64})
    @ DynamicPPL ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/context_implementations.jl:489
 [10] dot_tilde_assume
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/context_implementations.jl:327 [inlined]
 [11] dot_tilde_assume
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/context_implementations.jl:297 [inlined]
 [12] dot_tilde_assume!!
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/context_implementations.jl:423 [inlined]
 [13] macro expansion
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/compiler.jl:579 [inlined]
 [14] dynamic_model_with_dot_tilde(__model__::Model{…}, __varinfo__::TypedVarInfo{…}, __context__::SamplingContext{…}, num_zs::Int64)
    @ Main.MWE ./REPL[29]:12
 [15] _evaluate!!
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/model.jl:975 [inlined]
 [16] evaluate_threadunsafe!!
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/model.jl:948 [inlined]
 [17] evaluate!!
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/model.jl:896 [inlined]
 [18] evaluate!! (repeats 2 times)
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/model.jl:907 [inlined]
 [19] evaluate!!
    @ ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/model.jl:917 [inlined]
 [20] (::Model{typeof(Main.MWE.dynamic_model_with_dot_tilde), (:num_zs,), (), (), Tuple{Int64}, Tuple{}, DefaultContext})(args::TypedVarInfo{@NamedTuple{z::DynamicPPL.Metadata{…}, m::DynamicPPL.Metadata{…}}, Float64})
    @ DynamicPPL ~/.julia/packages/DynamicPPL/L81Uf/src/model.jl:867
 [21] top-level scope
    @ REPL[29]:20
Some type information was truncated. Use `show(err)` to see complete types.
@torfjelde
Copy link
Member

This is caused by lots of checks in get_and_set_val! (which is a very ugly function itself) performing some checks based on vns[1] and others based on vns[i].

We should just clean up that impl and this will be good 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants